We may never see flaggers if it's left up to the Legislature who are ruled by police unions.
From the Herald:
A government watchdog group said the state’s flagger reform effort is
coming up short on savings because of rules that keep wages for
non-police traffic direction tied to the rates earned by cops.
The
Pioneer Institute released a report today saying the Department of
Transportation’s savings have “not been significant” — $23 million over
three years — after the law passed allowing for non-cops to wave cars by
at construction sites.
“Rates for civilian flaggers are effectively set by the rate
paid to police performing flagger duties,” said Pioneer research
director Greg Sullivan, a former state inspector general, who wrote the
report with research assistant Michael Chieppo.
Massachusetts was
the last state in the country to allow for civilians to work as flaggers
on construction sites. The law, passed under former Gov. Deval Patrick
over the protests of police unions, has not led to widespread use of
civilian flaggers.
That’s at least in part because, the study’s
authors claim, the state prevailing-wage law ties civilian-flagger wages
to what cops would be getting for the same job — an average of $43.44
an hour for the civilian flaggers, well over the $28.99 nationwide
average.
“Gov. Patrick’s reforms were effectively negated in practical application,” the report states.
Flagging
work less commonly falls to cops in other states, where civilian
flaggers are the norm for many projects. The report says only four other
states have prevailing-wage laws in this regard as strong as
Massachusetts, mandating that the state has to pay at least the going
rate negotiated by organized labor for the same job.
The
savings the state has seen come from the fact civilian flaggers are only
paid for hours worked, whereas police flaggers are paid in four-hour
blocks, so they are on the clock often for more hours than they actually
work, says Pioneer, a small-government research organization.
The
report calls on the state Executive Office of Labor and Workforce
Development to determine a prevailing wage for flaggers — one that’s not
directly tied to the one negotiated by the cops.
“The state and municipalities would have a far greater incentive to use civilian flaggers,” the report states.
Gov. Charlie Baker’s office left the possibility of proposing a rule change up to the Legislature.
“The
administration supports the use of a combination of police details and
civilian flaggers on projects as directed by law, and would carefully
review any legislative proposals that reach the governor’s desk,” Baker
spokeswoman Sarah Finlaw told the Herald.
Neither the State Police Association nor the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association could be reached for comment.
Previous to 2008, all roadwork in
Massachusetts had to have police officers on scene for traffic control.
After the law change, projects on many less-traveled roads could use the
civilians instead.
About 4.4 percent of MassDOT’s roads
budget went to flaggers in the five years before the law. That portion
dropped to about 3.4 percent after the change.
No mater how small this is still savings and that is something. But the fact we have to pay the same rate we pay cops is ridiculous! Do we pay EMTs the same rate we pay doctors? Do we pay security guards the same rate we pay cops?
ReplyDeleteThe only way to fix this is through the legislature and I doubt and state rep or state senator is going to go against the cops to make this right
ReplyDeleteDetail pay for Framingham is around 875,000 according to George King.
ReplyDeleteI agree.. it's highly unlikely Ms. Robinson, Lewis or Gentile will ever get on board with this. Ms. Spilka may see the light and get this going in the Senate.... maybe.
Aren't are legislators elected to represent us? When did it become ok for them to ignore what their constituents ask them to do?
ReplyDeleteThat's how it's supposed to be but we've collectively let them off the hook and not held their feet to the fire.
ReplyDelete