Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Casino's ... who's betting on campaign contributions?

Their political action committees cashed in even bigger, with DeLeo’s Committee for a Democratic House and Murray’s Committee for a Democratic Senate raking in nearly $10,000 each from pro-gambling lobbyists and a handful of proponents of racinos.

That the very lawmakers who are designing the expanded gambling system are accepting cash from those who will profit the most is akin to stacking the deck, a leading watchdog group said.

“This is our pay-to-play system,” said Craig Holman, of the D.C.-based non-profit Public Citizen. “The lobbyist is the chief money-peddler on behalf of casinos. Lobbyist contributions are simply contributions from their clients. It’s part of the lobbyists’ salary.”

DeLeo’s campaign treasurer released a statement saying the speaker is “at work preparing the best bill for Massachusetts.”

Murray’s spokesman, David Falcone, noted that many of the lobbyists represent multiple clients and added that Murray “does her best not to accept contributions from anyone who is directly employed by a casino or gaming organization.”

The role of casino money in the push to approve gambling palaces and slot parlors underscored a 2008 Common Cause study showing gaming interests gave state lawmakers $1.5 million in campaign cash between 2002 and 2007. Gambling proponents also ponied up $8.2 million to lobbyists between 1998 and 2007, the study showed.

But as expanded gambling gets closer to reality, the Herald review found casino-related payments to lobbyists surged by a whopping 27 percent last year, to more than $2 million - an apparent record.

Two lobbyists hired by Las Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson, a Dorchester native, contributed more than $10,000 to Beacon Hill pols last year. Also heaping campaign dough on key lawmakers are former state Sen. Robert A. Bernstein and former House Ways and Means budget chief David K. Shapiro of Bay State Strategies, which represents the maker of slot machines for dozens of Las Vegas and Native American casinos.

Colorado developer David Nunes, who is pitching a $4 billion casino in Medford, hired Democratic lobbyist Paul M. Pezzella last year. “We believe at the end of the day this will all be about location and financial wherewithal,” Nunes said. “Buying yourself a license is never the way to go. Earning it is.”

Nunes’ lobbyist, Pezzella, contributed more than $11,000 to key lawmakers last year.

We can bet, nothing good will come of all on the Hill, who stand in line with their pocket books open. No one here would ever believe Senate Pres Murray's statement and look for more in depth reporting on this as time rolls on.

14 Comments:

At February 2, 2010 at 2:17 PM , Blogger Jerry G. said...

Murray does her best to not accept contributions? What is stopping her from simply not accepting them, not “doing her best”? Is there someone holding a gun to her head saying if you do not take my money I will shoot you? Who the hell does she think she is kidding?

 
At February 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

I really don’t care what they do or do not do at the state house, I care about how they vote and what that vote means to me. So, is a casino a good thing or a bad thing for Milford? If someone can give me a clear and concise answer to that question, then even I am willing to pay them for it!

 
At February 2, 2010 at 3:28 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

Are state reps elected to do what they want to do, what their constituents want them to do, or what the lobbyists bribe them to do? Seems that most of the people at the state house think the last choice is the right one. Maybe someone should have them review their oath of office.

 
At February 2, 2010 at 4:46 PM , Blogger Arnold said...

Where is this new ethics reform stuff I read about months ago? Does not seem to be in play in the casino game.

 
At February 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM , Blogger B. Murray said...

I have 1 pretty simple question, at least I think it is a simple question. If a casino in MA is such a good idea then why do lobbyists have to pay state reps to support it? Wouldn’t they support something that was good for the Commonwealth just because it was good for the Commonwealth? Can anyone answer that for me? Jim?

 
At February 2, 2010 at 5:21 PM , Blogger blog addict said...

Politics as usual here in MA. You would think after Brown’s victory these idiots would clean up their acts but this is just an example of how stupid they are at the state house. They don’t think what happened to Coakley could ever happen to them. Do you think they will get the message in November? I only hope all of these people who are so vocal in complaining about the state of our state go to the ballot box in November and remember the mess we are in. So many times the dems run adds and talking points that paint this great picture of them and we seem to forget what the truth is. Don’t forget this year people.

 
At February 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

And this surprises anyone why????? Have you not been paying attention?????

 
At February 3, 2010 at 9:23 AM , Blogger Tim W. said...

Jim your thoughts on this, the Casino in Milford? I am more interested in that than I am in the goings on at the state house. Can not identify with those people but can relate to you and what you have to say on the subject, so tell us what you have to say about the casino. And while you are on that topic of what you think, how do you think this Cape Wind deal is going to play out? Are we going to see turbines off the coast of the Cape, or is there going to be some last minute revelation that is going to prevent these from going up?

 
At February 3, 2010 at 10:53 AM , Blogger Not my problem said...

I am curious if there has been any type of open meeting in Milford to let the people who live there actually ask questions and get answers from the people who would actually build this thing. Seems that they are the ones who will be impacted, so they are the ones that the lobbyists should be talking to. What state house rep or senator lives in Milford, and what is their stand on the casino issue?

 
At February 3, 2010 at 11:23 AM , Blogger Jim Pillsbury said...

Tim, on the Wind Turbines. Interior Sec Ken Salazar had a three hour boat tour of the site with The Indians yesterday. He made no commitment either way. Given that Obama and most residents of this State want the turbines and the Indians who don't, my guess is that Salzar will make a deal to get the turbines going. I still belive the Feds could use the casino trump card and let the Indians build a casino in Middleboro. My only fear is that this project will be somehow blocked by the R's and those very rich who's site line will be altered. Obama has to make thsi happen, on way or the other.

Casino in Milford.... will rest mostly on the campaign contributions, no matter what the residents say. Spilka and others from the area will stall this process through the summer and perhaps through the Nov elections.

There are many gambling/casino players from around the country out there with lots of money to through at the pols to get what they want.

Deval, DeLeo and Murray will have more say in this than anyone and of coarse, we know, when it comes to getting anything done on the Hill, it's all about the money.

The overall effects of a casino in Milford may piss off most of the residents around Milford, and one can bet that those who live in Hopkinton, Holliston, Ashland ,etc, will be against a casino there. Palmer and Middleboro are less populated and would likely be better locations.

A casino anywhere in the State will provide jobs and lots of mitigation fees tacked on to anyone who wishes to build in their community, which could sway most detractors.

 
At February 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM , Blogger Jim Pillsbury said...

There's a public meeting at the Framingham Library on Monday in the Constan room from 7 to 9 PM, if anyone wants to hear what they have to say.

 
At February 5, 2010 at 5:27 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hope to see lots of my fellow bloggers at that meeting.

 
At March 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

Well written article
judi online

 
At March 22, 2017 at 3:32 AM , Blogger Roman lesnar said...

It is a great website.. The Design looks very good.. Keep working like that!. poker tournament

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home