Another discrimination lawsuit against Framingham
A new lawsuit was filed by Nathalie Jean, our community development coordinator, claims she was racially discriminated against at work. I have seen some of the Finance meetings and will admit, Judy Grove seem to have it in for her. The MWDN has finally got a reporter to dig into something that's news worthy.
You can only see one meeting on demand from Gov TV. The past meetings seem to be archived already. I believe when the lawyers see the meetings, they may agree, Jean was ragged on.
Unfortunately, any past meetings from April 1 back seem to be already archived. I'm sure the lawyers will want to see them all. I have asked Rego where the older meetings are archived.
0 to 11mintes.
Judy Grove, District 8 City
Councilor and member of the Finance Subcommittee, told the Daily News that
since Framingham transitioned to a city government, the Finance Subcommittee
has focused on more aggressive oversight of spending across city government.
“If she thinks this is individual,
it is not,” Grove said, adding that the Finance Subcommittee has been hard on
departments ranging from the Department of Public Works to the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Affairs Department. “That’s what we do. We don’t sit
back and rubber stamp things. It’s across the board. We’re trying to find out
where all this money is going.”
They FSC turned a blind eye to the excessive OT in the budget.
Here's the story from MWDN by Jeannette Hinkle
Nathalie Jean filed a racial
discrimination complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission in November 2018, but continued to work until she went on medical
leave to cope with ongoing anxiety on Aug. 1
FRAMINGHAM - Last fall, Nathalie
Jean awoke to what she thought was a heart attack. Her chest felt constricted,
and her heart was beating irregularly.
When the symptoms persisted, Jean
stopped at an urgent care clinic along Rte. 9 on her way home from work, a stop
she said she made multiple times after suffering what she said were
anxiety-related symptoms in the months that followed.
Jean said a doctor told her she was
having panic attacks. She said they were caused by stress at her job as a
community development coordinator in Framingham’s Division of Community and
Economic Development.
Jean, who is black, said the stress
stemmed from racial discrimination she faced at work – stress that worsened
after going through what she considered aggressive questioning by the Finance
Subcommittee during spring budget talks about her work with federal community
development block grants.
She filed a racial discrimination
complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in November
2018, but continued to work until she went on medical leave to cope with
ongoing anxiety on Aug. 1. The Daily News learned of the complaint while
researching a story about Framingham’s block grant program.
She has not yet returned to work but
plans to do so.
“The apartheid-like and hostile environment
where an entire institution used its full strength of force without any
external protection for me from its abuses literally made me sick,” Jean wrote
in a statement she released on Tuesday.
City officials vehemently deny
Jean’s charge of discrimination, and members of the Finance Subcommittee say
their questioning was only an attempt to understand how the block grant funds
under Jean’s management were administered. The city typically receives about
$500,000 a year in community development block grants.
Mayor Yvonne Spicer said she could
not comment on Jean’s leave, but rejected Jean’s claim that she faced
discrimination as a city employee.
“I’m speaking to you as an
African-American woman, so I certainly disagree that anything has ever had to
do with race,” Spicer told The Daily News. “I think she was always deemed as a
person that added to the team of community and economic development.”
Draft reorganization plans demoted
her, city disagrees
At the center of Jean’s
discrimination charge is her claim that Arthur Robert, former director of the
Community and Economic Development Division, and current division deputy
director Erika Jerram, downgraded her role in plans to reorganize the division.
The division’s reorganization was
mandated by the charter Framingham adopted at the beginning of 2018 when it transitioned
from a town government to a city government. Robert presented two reorganization
proposals to the City Council, first in October 2018, the second in
May 2019. Both were rejected, and a third plan was never proposed. Robert
resigned in July.
Jean said that in the proposed
reorganization plans, her rank in the division was lowered from department head
to subordinate of the division’s deputy director. She said the move amounted to
a demotion and was made because she is black.
Jean said Robert was “always
aggressively punitive” toward her before the failed reorganization attempts,
which she claimed were used as “a pretext for discrimination.”
“The plan promoted all similarly
situated white department or division heads, except for me, the black one,”
Jean wrote in her statement.
In a response to Jean’s federal
discrimination complaint, Jeffrey McAllister, an attorney working for the city,
denied that Jean was ever discriminated against or treated unfairly by Robert
or Jerram, adding that Jean had been warned about being discourteous toward
staff on multiple occasions.
McAllister said that Jean was never
a department head and that while she did lead “the Community Development aspect
of the Division, the City did not consider that office to be a true
‘Department,’ such as the Department of Public Works or some other major
department,” according to the city’s rebuttal of Jean’s EEOC complaint.
“Thus, Ms. Jean’s comparison of
herself to other, true department heads for pay purposes was inaccurate,” he
wrote. The draft reorganization plans were created with the help of a
consultant who had no knowledge of Jean’s race, McAllister wrote.
Jean said she had always reported to
Robert, the division director, not Jerram, the division deputy director. The
rejected reorganization plans had her reporting to Jerram. Jean pointed to the
job posting she applied to before being hired in November 2015 as evidence that
she was, in fact, a department head.
The job description reads, “The
Community Development (CD) Coordinator directs Framingham’s Community
Development (CD) Department within the Division of Community and Economic
Development (CED).”
The Daily News confirmed with the
city’s Human Resources department that Jean’s employment code, which was also
the employment code used for the person who held the job before her, is not the
same as that of other department heads in the city.
Finance Subcommittee budget
questions block grant spending process
Jean also claims that Finance
Subcommittee questioning over the course of several meetings during spring
budget talks was “very rough,” adding that it felt to her as if it was a
“public, fault-finding process.”
As previously reported by the Daily
News, members of the Finance Subcommittee took issue with the fact
that Jean is essentially in charge of proposing how much of the city’s federal
community development block grant is distributed, a fact that they were
previously unaware of. They thought those decisions were made by a committee.
Some members of the Finance
Subcommittee were also distressed to learn that $238,856 in grant money from
previous years remains unspent.
Members of the Finance Subcommittee
began questioning Jean about her role after she denied a request for a raise
from Downtown Framingham Inc. Director Courtney Thraen, whose salary is
entirely funded by the city’s community development block grant.
Judy Grove, District 8 City
Councilor and member of the Finance Subcommittee, told the Daily News that
since Framingham transitioned to a city government, the Finance Subcommittee
has focused on more aggressive oversight of spending across city government.
“If she thinks this is individual,
it is not,” Grove said, adding that the Finance Subcommittee has been hard on
departments ranging from the Department of Public Works to the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Affairs Department. “That’s what we do. We don’t sit
back and rubber stamp things. It’s across the board. We’re trying to find out
where all this money is going.”
Neither Jean’s role in proposing how
the grant money is distributed, nor the fact that grant money is rolled over
breaks federal guidelines because public hearings are held before the money is
allocated.
Jean stressed that she properly
administered the grant, and that money remained unspent because there were not
enough proposals on which to spend the funds, which are intended to benefit
low- and moderate-income residents. Finance Subcommittees said more effort
should have been made to find projects on which to spend the funds, as city
residents have needs that are currently going unmet.
Jean also emphasized that she has
been meticulous in administering the block grant funds, airing on the side of
caution, because of mismanagement of the grant that occurred before she joined
the division in November 2015.
Town audits in 2014 and 2015 found
several deficiencies in how the town administered the grant, including improper
reporting of block grant awards and rehab inspections, improper documentation
of environmental reviews, and other violations.
A 2015 audit found that “internal
controls over the procurement process within the Community Development Office
and specifically with federal HUD grants were deficient,” and in January 2015,
a housing quality inspector working with the grant was fired after the town
determined he “exhibited conduct that at a minimum is grossly incompetent, and
potentially fraudulent or criminal in nature as well.”
Jean said previous mismanagement of the grant meant she had
to essentially build up the block grant program from scratch without
instruction from anyone familiar with the program, which she said was at “a
complete standstill.”
Framingham’s community development
block grant program is still recovering from the mismanagement identified
before she arrived, which is one reason more than $200,000 in grant funds
remain unspent, Jean said.
Jean hoping for ‘a quiet comeback’
Jean said, despite her experiences,
she wants to make a “quiet comeback” to work in Framingham at what she said was
a “dream job” in a community that she loves. She said she’s set a return date
with the city, but did not want to make that date public.
“This job totally coalesces with my
goals and career,” Jean told the Daily News, adding that she enjoys working
with community members to provide grant funding that fills needs in the city.
Jean told the Daily News that the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sent her a letter informing her that
she could proceed to filing a lawsuit against the city. In the end she decided
not to do so.
“I’m fighting for my career,” she
said. “I wasn’t looking to make a million dollars.”
10 Comments:
So the story says the woman is going back to work at some point for the city. How does that make any sense if they have discriminated against her? Has she gotten resolution of the issues she filed a complaint about and if not, why would she go back to that same toxic environment
I don't get it. Is this woman suing for money or not? Story seems to indicate she is not.
I know the city (then a town) lost a law suit filed against us by SMOC for being biased. I believe a Framingham educator also won a law suit against Framingham for discrimination. How many others have their been, what has been the outcome, and exactly how much money has Framingham spent on this type of suit, and how much have we paid out for those we lost?
I don't get from the piece she is suing for money... but I have no first hand knowledge.
She has been grilled on many occasions by the finance sub committee. If you look at all other division heads who appeared before them... no one has gotten that type of treatment. Of coarse all the others are white.
we've lost a few that I know, the SMOC one was a million bucks. And if what I read is true, candidate Pascual won a big one as well.
My guess is she a tough cookie and will not let them force her out of Town. Roberts is gone, (former EDIC Head) which means at some point, the Mayor will have to hire (in process) a new manager. I wouldn't blame her a bit if she wanted to stray in her present job.
All this over 10k cut in downtown's Courtney Thraen salary, which is federally controlled.
The other part of this is Ms. Grove and her alleged scrutiny of the budget. I served with her on the Ways&Means for a few years and each year we reviewed the CBDG budget. None of this ever came up as I recall.
You can see for yourself the tone of King and Grove in the meetings and I'm sure the lawyers will be using that footage to make part of their case.
I think this woman is justified in her complaint. I see no other reason for her filing this suit. Sounds to me like she was treated very poorly and deserves her day in court.
Have not watched the meeting but I have seen King go after someone and my take on him is he is polite but determined to get his answers and when he does not get them he does not give up. Grove is out of her league. She is a nice woman who means well but is too easily led astray by others.
So a black woman is suing the City, which is led by a black woman, claiming that she is being discriminated against because she is black. What am I missing here?
King talks the talk... but rarely walks the walk. He's petrified of the Cops and Fireman and lets to many small things go imo. Granted he saved tax payers 200 bucks, but there was more low hanging fruit. I wish i had served with him on the council, I could have provided cover in some areas of the budget.
Try to watch the video... it's telling imo. The constant barrage of questions they already know the answer to. The federal guild-lines are in stone. That position was only granted so much of the money.. why? because Courtney didn't work full time.... makes sense to me. Why would we want an employee dolling out money from the feds to give away something that the rules say no to. She was just doing her job imo.
The root causes are gone now... I'd go back.
I'll try to post all the meetings that FSC did with her.
it's not about the black Mayor..it's about the way this women was treated by an all white group of senior citizens. Watch the video if you can... it speaks volumes.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home