Loring contractor sues the city
From the MWDN:
FRAMINGHAM — A Connecticut company hired to rebuild Loring Arena
claims the city is illegally withholding payments for its work,
breaching a roughly $6 million contract.
Lupachino &
Salvatore, the general contractor for the project, is suing Framingham
in Suffolk Superior Court to recover money it claims is due for labor
and materials.
The company, based in Bloomfield, Connecticut,
signed a $5,634,000 contract with Framingham in January 2017. Work
included renovating the hockey rink and building a new front entrance
with a handicapped-accessible elevator.
City officials have since approved at least three major contract amendments, adding close to $300,000 to the total cost.
Work
was scheduled to conclude by mid-August 2018, but the reopening of the
arena was delayed as the city pressed the contractor to fix deficiencies
in the work. Officials blamed construction errors and poor workmanship
by subcontractors for the delays.
After
reviewing the requests, the city’s architect levied what the contractor
called “baseless backcharges” against the company, bringing the
allowable amount for change orders to $25,272, according to the suit.
“The
grounds provided by (the architecture firm) for rejecting these change
order proposals are unfounded and represent little more than an attempt
by the Town to avoid its obligation to pay L&S for extra and changed
work performed at the Town’s direction,” the complaint reads.
The
company alleges it is owed a little more than $1 million for the work
performed at Loring. It also accuses the city of breaching its contract
and state laws regarding payment requests.
The lawsuit includes
two other counts accusing the city of acting in bad faith, and asking a
judge to consider ordering the city to pay the company for the
reasonable value of its work at the project site, rather than the amount
remaining under the contract. L&S pegged the value of its work to
date at more than $7 million, putting the theoretical value due at more
than $1.8 million.
In
an interview Friday, Petrini said the city found a number of defects
with the contractor’s work, including defective and incomplete
installations and change orders requests that were untimely, overpriced
or lacking sufficient documentation.
“We feel they should step to the plate and get the work done,” Petrini said.
Petrini said the city will respond to the lawsuit in court within the next several weeks. He said the city anticipates filing counterclaims against Lupachino & Salvatore.
“We’re not going to pay money that we don’t feel is properly owed,” he said.
6 Comments:
Why are we always being sued? If they have not done the job they were hired to do why would they think they should be paid when the work is not done? Begs the question of where the disconnect is between the city and the contractor that is resulting in additional legal expenses for this project.
At the last few years of Town Meeting, Loring came to ask for more money for the contractor. I remember the hockey moms taking over the article. They got the added funding, but everyone said.. no more. I spoke with Jim Paolini back then and he did say the contractor was doing shoddy work and some of it didn't pass building code inspection. If Paolini said the work wasn't done correctly, I would believe him. It was Paolini who first discovered the outside ADA compliance issues.
This type of problem should not take place years from now when the new Fuller school is completed. We have an overseer working for us.
What do we do about this now? Is it worth it to incur legal expenses if we are going to lose the court case anyway, or are we likely to win this one?
I think it's a win for the City. Even I know that there were quality issue's there with the contractor and I do remember them having to tear up the ADA ramp because it was not compliant. I think the record may have been established and well documented. I don't think Jim Paolini would not authorize the payments if the work was done to the standards. The guy is taking us to court so we have to respond. I don't think it's a long dragged out court process, much will be already known when they hit the court house steps.
OK, then lets hope you are right Jim. This gets settled fast and we are the winners in this lawsuit.
Thanks for sharing, it was interesting to read!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home