Wednesday, September 12, 2018

The drug lab scandall and it's lingering effects on the tax payers

As our readers will attest, this subject of the drug lab scandal has been written about on this blog extensively. Way back I wrote that the State would be on the hook for the expenses the scandal has created. At this point, thanks to a SJC ruling from Colorado that ordered the State to refund fees to woman who was convicted but later acquitted of felony drug charges.  Our State now is looking at a price tag of maybe 10 million to pay back. But where does that money come from you ask? in comes Beacon Hill who will have to address this with a funding source. This also means, the money confiscated in many cases by the local cops must be paid back but as we know, it's already been spent or stolen. There is a case here in Framingham Court involving Stephanie Green who had her convictions vacated in 2017.
The lack of accountability and oversight has made this mess and now the tax payers will be on the hook to pay those people who have had their cases vacated. And what about the assets that have been taken, auctioned off? Cars, boats, jewelry, guns, homes?

From the Globe:

An assistant state attorney general estimates it could cost “north of $10 million” to reimburse fees and fines of defendants whose convictions were thrown out because of a pair of drug lab scandals in Massachusetts, court records show.
Answering a question from a state Supreme Court justice, Robert E. Toone said he thought the state would have to pay “a large amount of money” to defendants to compensate them for fines and fees they had to pay because of their convictions.
Tens of thousands of convictions have been vacated because of the misconduct of Annie Dookhan, a former chemist at the state’s Hinton drug lab in Jamaica Plain, and another former chemist, Sonja Farak, who worked at an Amherst drug lab.
“I would imagine, once you combine the Dookhan-Farak defendants, it’s probably north of $10 million,” Toone said during an appearance before the state’s high court on Friday. “That is only my personal estimate.”
On Friday, the court heard two cases together in which defendants’ convictions were vacated in connection with Dookhan’s misconduct.
One of the cases was out of Haverhill, in which Jose A. Martinez had three drug convictions vacated and the charges dismissed because of Dookhan’s malfeasance, according to court filings. The other matter arose from two cases involving Stephanie Green out of Framingham District Court. Green had convictions vacated in 2017 because of an SJC ruling related to the Dookhan scandal, according to court filings.

11 Comments:

At September 13, 2018 at 9:52 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can we go after Dooken for any of this money? Not that she is in a position to pay it I know but she should not walk away without some responsibility for what she cost the state

 
At September 13, 2018 at 10:43 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does insurance of any kind kick in to cover these costs? Can you get insurance against the repercussions from the actions of bad employees?

 
At September 13, 2018 at 1:24 PM , Blogger jim pillsbury said...

She's doing 3 years in prison and hopefully lost any pension benefits. I don't think insurance would cover this but I'm sure if we could recoup any monies, the press would have reported it already.

 
At September 13, 2018 at 3:39 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lets ask Charlie Baker to donate his salary every year to go towards these costs. With all the fiscal malfeasance happening under his watch, he should have to suffer some consequences.

 
At September 13, 2018 at 3:50 PM , Blogger jim pillsbury said...

now there's an idea.

 
At September 13, 2018 at 5:26 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Will Framingham Police have to turn over any of the civil forfeture money they got from any of these cases the end up being thrown out? If they do, and if that money has been spent, or in Framingham's case stolen, so they don't have it to turn over, is the City of Framingham going to have to come up with that money?

 
At September 13, 2018 at 5:46 PM , Blogger jim pillsbury said...

I believe they would have to. Good point.

 
At September 14, 2018 at 4:01 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the city has to pay, where does that money come from? Could something like this result in higher property taxes? On top of the debt exclusion for Fuller, this could push me out of my house as I am on fixed income with not a lot of wiggle room. Should I be worried?

 
At September 14, 2018 at 4:03 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you sure that woman who caused all these issues is not getting her pension? I thought I read somewhere she was getting it, but I am hoping I am wrong. Can you check that out Jim? If she is getting it, lets put a lien on it to cover these potential costs. And if she is not getting it, the money that would have been in her pension account, where is that going now?

 
At September 14, 2018 at 4:30 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lets hope this does not fall on us to pay. With the mayors increase in our water rates, property taxes going up, food and gas and health insurance costs going up I am going to just barely get by

 
At September 14, 2018 at 4:48 PM , Blogger jim pillsbury said...

I'll ask if she will.

I'm in the same place. If I didn't have Steph, I'd have to sell my house. 1940 a month after healthcare costs doesn't leave much for tax and water increases.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home