Some of the rich white folks in district 1 have taken a stand against Doug Stephen's approach to saving the family farm and preserving a large chunk of land as open sp[ace. A Southboro resident who should have no say in what Framingahm does with it's farm land has made up unsubstantiated claims that the pot growing business will effect their property. I've seen the Planning Board meeting where a few residents spoke about air quality and the safety of wild animals roaming the woods. I cannot fathom why educated people in that district allow themselves to be sucked into propaganda about growing pot. IMO, much of this could have and should have been explained at the planning board meetings by experts and regulators. This would have helped residents to understand what exactly will happen there. In 2016, 15k voters voted to legalize marijuana, included of which was growing marijuana. I can't believe after all these years I'm hearing another reefer madness story.
Also, watch to see if the Mayor has taken more money from the operators that the State has allowed in the Host Agreement.
FRAMINGHAM, MA — Framingham is on
track to have its first marijuana grow facility on Eastleigh Farm — but a large
group of abutters and residents are asking the city to pump the breaks on the
decision. A petition with 90 signatures from Framingham and Southborough
residents circulated around the city and asks that the Planning Board's
approval of the facility be repealed.
The petition claims the application
did not provide adequate evidence, including data and engineering analysis, of
the facility's effects on the farm and the neighboring environment. The
petition also claims the Planning Board's decision is not supported by
Framingham's Zoning By-Laws, specifically, the board's categorization of the
proposal having a minor site plan review instead of a major site plan review.
The proposed facility is being
spearheaded by Commonwealth Farm 1761, a company backed by Hollywood actor and Boston native
Jonathan Tucker. The company plans on building a two-and-a-half-acre
marijuana cultivation and manufacturing facility in the middle of the 112-acre
parcel of land at Eastleigh Farm. While cultivation and manufacturing will be
the main purpose of the facility, Commonwealth Farm has marketed the plan as a
means to save Eastleigh Farm.
According to the company's business
plan, the rent money will help save Eastleigh Farm and allow it to maintain
their existing operations on the property. At a meeting with the Planning
Board, the company's attorney said the owner of the farm has control of the
land and has no plans of further development. The company collaborated
on a video with Eastleigh Farm, outlining the farm's importance to
the community and the push to save it.
Eastleigh Farm is one of the largest
undeveloped parcels of land in the city.
Eastleigh Farm has been struggling
to stay afloat for years. The land was bought in 2002 by the current owner,
Doug Stephan, with the intention of saving it from development and reconverting
it into a dairy farm. By 2015 the farm stopped selling dairy products and
focused efforts on rebranding and bringing new business in.
A court petition against the
Framingham Planning Board was filed on Sept. 5 by Caroline Rossen, a
Southborough resident, that included the 90 signatures from abutting residents.
The petition mentions how previous attempts at developing parts of the farm
were blocked, with one reason a proposal in 2018 was blocked being a lack of
access for construction vehicles to the site.
The petition also specifically
mentions a need for detailed data of the proposed mechanical design of the
ventilation/exhaust system, the capacity of the mechanical plant, noise levels
and remediation designs. Property values and livability were mentioned in the
petition, reading in part, "This application does not include any
provisions about the Applicant's financial accountability for potential adverse
effect of their operations on the neighborhood."
During the Planning Board's initial
meeting to review Commonwealth Farms' application, a handful of residents
voiced concerns. The biggest questions were focused on the odor the facility
might produce and traffic mitigation. The Commonwealth 1761 team assured the
board the building will be equipped with carbon filtration systems to control
any odors. As for traffic, the company plans to hire 100 full- and part-time
workers, many of whom will park at an offsite location and take a shuttle into
the facility.
The company's lawyer, Adam Fine,
told Patch the petition is inaccurate. "Commonwealth Farms has been
incredibly transparent through this process and the application was incredibly
thorough," he said.
Countering some points made by the
petition, Fine said there has been no evidence that shows living near a
marijuana cultivation/production facility would hurt property values. He added
that issues concerning noise and odor are handled during the licensing process
so that they never come to fruition once a facility is running. "As part
of the licensing process, you can't have odor, if you have odor, the state's
not going to renew your license," he said.
Offering kudos to the city, Fine
said Framingham has some of the most thorough and stringent processes he'd seen
in the state and had full confidence that the Planning Board followed
appropriate protocol. "Commonwealth Farm wants to have an ongoing dialogue
about the facility — no call goes unanswered for them," Fine said.
The petitioners also wrote a letter
to the Mayor Yvonne Spicer and had a private meeting with her to discuss their
concerns. The letter to the mayor highlights concerns that public input was not
equally taken into account during the review of the Commonwealth's application.
The letter reads in part:
"We believe that there are flaws in the protocol
process that was followed and that a broad and open public discussion that
addresses concerns of the local community should precede any meaningful
decision. It is a matter of public interest that should be decided in
partnership with local community - not in the backrooms."
Patch reached out to Framingham
spokeswoman Kelly McFalls but did not receive a response.
In Commonwealth Farms business plan,
the company plans on adding 30 full-time executive jobs and approximately 100
cultivation jobs, in addition to hiring qualified, local contractors and vendors.
Salaries are not specified in the application but employees will be paid
"a living wage ," with full benefits included.
As for monetary benefits to the
city, the application states, "A Host Community Agreement with significant
monetary donations will provide the City with additional financial benefits
beyond local property taxes."
10 Comments:
Isn't this already a done deal? I would think neighbors would prefer this to a large development that would impact traffic and city services.
2 1/2 acres out of over 100 acres? Seems like a pretty small piece of the property is going to be involved and it saves us from having lots of new development on all 112 acres. No brainer if you ask me. And residents of Sudbury should have no standing in this argument as their planning and zoning boards have no rights here in Framingham
it is a done as far as I know. I wonder what the same people would say if Stephen had 100 cows or 1000 chickens or a heard of goats,talk about smells, not to mention the huge housing complex that could be built there. Next step would be a legal challenge by the 90 residents I suppose.
Quick question for those in the know. If the farm is 112 acres, and the 2 1/2 acres being used for this pot farm are in the middle, how is anyone of these people considered to be an abutter?
Never thought about what that last poster said. If this small piece of the farm is surrounded on 4 sides with acres between it and actual abbutters then they should not really have any say even if they are in Framingham, which not all of them are.
Significant monetary benefits to the city exactly what do they call significant?
Good point..I don't think there are 90 home owners who live that close to the farm to begin with. And notice, none of the two candidates for district 1 have weighed in on this. Long and Norton sit on the Planning Board. Everyone knows Bloomfield is against anything marijuana related and is part of the mis-information and propaganda campaign that has fanned the flames of this fire and encouraged the opposition with more reefer madness.
Lets see how far the abuters are willing to go.
I wouldn't at all be surprised if the host agreement is more than the 3%. Keeping in mind, that money was only supposed to be for expenses incurred by the Town. I can't see any reason to charge them anything at this point. No cop details for a grow facility that doesn't serve the public. The Hollywood actor's company has plenty of seed money to spread around and is one reason why only rich white folks are getting into the business.
How do we find out what all the hosts agreements are offering the city? Are these agreements public records, and if not, why not?
I made a public records request today for the host agreement (Commonwealth Farms 1761)with the Mayor's office. Good question I should have an answer to.. thanks for the common sense question.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home