Robo call last night from a few candidates
Did any of our readers get that robo call last night? It was a disguised as a Framingham Survey. The questions were about who you liked among, King, Lembruno, Pascual and Stefanini. One question was would you support a slate of candidates that the Mayor supports. Looks like a few candidates are worried about the up-coming election and may use the results of the survey to create more problems for the Mayor.
Now with the news of Ms. Pascual being kicked off the negotiating team with the janitors I wonder if this will narrow the field for at-large.
From the Source:
FRAMINGHAM – A member of the
Framingham School Committee has been removed from the negotiating team for the
Unit C contract, after allegations by union members.
Five of the six Framingham Public
School unions have settled their contracts. The only contracted unsettled is
with Unit C, custodial employees.
Framingham School Committee Chair
Adam Freudberg had appointed District 6 School Committee member Geoffrey
Epstein and District 8 School Committee member Gloria Pascual to the
negotiations team, along with Assistant Superintendent of Schools Inna London,
Assistant Director of Human Resources Tiago Gadens, Buildings & Grounds
Director Matthew Torti and David Connolly, the school district’s attorney from
Morgan, Brown, & Joy.
Epstein and Pascual have been on the
Unit C negotiations team since February 2018.
Today, September 9, Freudberg issued
a memo to all nine elected School Committee members to say the new members on
the negotiations team are Epstein and District 1 School Committee member
Beverly Hugo.
“Legal counsels have indicated that
this subcommittee membership appointment was a necessary and authorized
action,” wrote Freudberg,
Earlier in the day, London wrote a
memo to the 9-member elected School Committee, as well as Framingham
Superintendent of Schools Bob Tremblay, which indicated Pascual was conducting
in behavior not appropriate for an individual negotiating a union contract.
London informed the School Committee
and Superintendent that “recently an employee who would like to remain
anonymous for fear of potential retaliation informed Mr. Gadens, my Assistant
Director, and me that a member of the School Committee, Gloria Pascual, has
been going around to multiple custodians making offers about contract terms,
and asking them how they feel about specific FPS employees.”
“According to the employee she
referred to multiple FPS employees with nicknames which could be construed as
discriminatory. Also, according to the employee she told the custodians with
whom she spoke that there needs to be a complete overhaul in HR,” wrote London
in her memo.
Editor’s Note: The memo is not
marked confidential. It was sent to all nine elected School Committee members,
which makes it a public document.
“The employee, moreover, indicated
that Ms. Pascual was telling the custodians that she heard that the MOA was
voted down and told the custodians to have the union president, reach out to
her directly because she can give them what they want,” wrote London to the
School Committee.
“The employee cited instances of
complaints by multiple staff members in their notification” to Framingham
Public Schools Human Resources, wrote London.
“I was surprised to learn in a group
email that School Committee Chair Adam Freudberg had summarily removed me from
a contract negotiation team without direct notification. His decision was based
on anonymous, unfounded, and untruthful allegations which he never attempted to
discuss with me beforehand. This action is in violation of the Framingham
School
Committee policy Section K, policy KE – Public Complaints, which says no action should be taken on anonymous complaints,” said Pascual to SOURCE.
Committee policy Section K, policy KE – Public Complaints, which says no action should be taken on anonymous complaints,” said Pascual to SOURCE.
“The summary given to the School
Committee and to the media pointedly left out my response to HR Assistant
Superintendent Inna London when she first notified me of these anonymous and
baseless accusations on June 20th (not last month as she stated in her email
yesterday),” said Pascual on Tuesday morning to SOURCE.
The Framingham Public School
District reached out to Pascual discuss the allegations made by the union
members this summer.
“Legal counsel has indicated that
these are serious concerns raised by FPS staff, noted they are allegations, but
that this is counter to collective bargaining and ethics rules and practices,
and would put the district at risk for unfair labor practice complaints and
legal action(s) by the union,” wrote London.
The National Labor Relations Board has laws on union contract
negotiations, as does the state.
“While there was no reason for me to
debate the veracity of these claims or seek funding for a formal investigation,
I felt obliged to inform Ms. Pascual herself (which I did last month) and to
notify the School Committee, Superintendent, and legal counsel,” wrote London,
who said she also provided Pascual with Framingham School Committee policies
“which pertain to negotiations, chains of commands, as well as communications
with FPS employees.”
“The District has been notified that
the State Ethics Commission has been making inquiries into this matter,” wrote
London to the School Committee.
“Due to statutory
requirements for confidentiality that are placed on the Commission by
State statute, I can neither confirm nor deny whether the Commission is
reviewing any matter,” said the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission
spokesperson Gerry Tuoti.
“After learning of a series of
complaints this summer, school district legal counsels both independently said
this change in subcommittee membership was an appropriate action to protect the
school district. Acting to make this change is necessary because laws, ethics,
transparency, and the integrity of the collective bargaining process matters,”
said School Committee Chair Freudberg.
“Included below is my email response
to Ms. London dated July 1st. The gist of my response was that the anonymous
charges weren’t true and that if the HR department chose to go forward with an
investigation, I asked to be notified. I never heard another word about it, and
I thought the matter
was put to rest. Then there was yesterday’s shocking development which came more than two months later. The charges are false. The process that got the School Committee leadership to this decision is very flawed. The timing of this controversy is highly suspect,” said Pascual.
was put to rest. Then there was yesterday’s shocking development which came more than two months later. The charges are false. The process that got the School Committee leadership to this decision is very flawed. The timing of this controversy is highly suspect,” said Pascual.
“I have contacted the State Ethics
Commission to seek guidance on how best to address this heavy-handed attack on
my personal integrity and ethics as a public servant,” said Pascual to SOURCE.
“I have written a letter to the
chair of the School Committee requesting that I be reappointed immediately to
the negotiation team for Unit C,” said Pascual.
“I am the chair of that subcommittee and aware
of what is happening,” said District 6 School Committee member Epstein. “There
is a posted meeting of the Unit C subcommittee on Tuesday at 4:30 p.m.”
***
20 Comments:
Wow skipped the trial part and right to sentancing. And the lady never even given a chance to defend herself against an anonymous allegation. Looks like a complete fix job.
That could very well be... the timing on this is bad. Will it be resolved before the election is another question. Lot's of players involved which may not serve the interests of our city. And headlines are what people remember the most, for a while. This whole episode will make for interesting questions in up-coming candidate forums.
I agree, there is nothing to indicate she broke any laws. I think Lembruno recognizes this woman is tough competition and is using any means at her disposal to cast Pasqual in a bad light. No one should be judging her until we hear all the facts. I applaud MWD for waiting to have those facts before posting a story. The Source often skirts the outside edges of ethical and accurate reporting. In her effort to be first, she often gets is wrong, but then, so many of those who would be concerned about Pasqual are big supporters of the Source, which explains why she cow tows to them. I encourage residents to not get all your news from any one source. With fake news being so rampant now a days, you need to verify what you read all the time.
I got that survey call last night. I did answer the questions more because I was very interested in what they were asking about in hopes I could determine who paid for it. I believe at the end I heard them say the survey was being conducted by ISG Services but I have no idea who they are. To me the most interesting questions was whether the mayor supporting a slate of candidates would influence you to vote for, or against that slate. I think whoever paid for this is trying to figure out if having the mayor support them is good, or bad, for their campaign. Just saying.
“It’s hard to know, or hard to imagine really, that they couldn’t find the records before, but now they can find them,” said the attorney, who spoke on the condition he not be named for fear of harming his client’s case. “It’s really hard to think of a legitimate reason ... There’s got to be a story there.” Ya think!!!???? There is for certain a story here but it is doubtful we will ever know the full extent of this systemic corruption. Fire them all and start fresh. Gilpin should go. This coverup happened under her watch.
How do we find out who paid for that survey call and how do we get access to the results of that survey or do the results only go to the people who paid for it?
Lets her the candidates side of the story in full before we pass judgement. Sounds like she is not going to take this lying down, so I suspect we have not heard the end of this. Suspicious timing for this to come out now when it started last year. Why yesterday unless someone is trying to influence the election.
we won't know much if anything until the candidates file their campaign finance reports out lining expenditures which may be after the election.I'm not sure when they all have to report.
Of course someone is trying to influence an election. But now it shows how dirty the politics are becoming in Framingham. Now things are happening that will possibly follow this person around professionally for the rest of her life. And all without having the chance to have any say in the matter. Politics here has reached an all new low.
Interesting timing don't you agree? THey did this after Sept. 1st so it won't show on anyone's campaign finance report until after the preliminary election is over. Which is actually sort of suspicious since none of those I suspect paid for this are running in the preliminary. Has anyone just publicly asked who paid for this?
It is way past time for a municipal level independent elections commission. If there are suspicions about election fraud it could investigate such claims to see if there is evidence of fraud, meddling, or interference based on misinformation, etc. and then issue fines, refer matters to the state ethics board, AG, and/or DA. It could also set clearer and stricter rules for political spending, and other activities. Robocalls, for one, should be banned. Period.
Jim how ya feeling about your SC guy, Freudburg? After this whole political shitstorm, do you still trust him?
I wholeheartedly agree with the previous poster, we need an independent elections commission. How do we make that happen?
I'll wait to see what the outcome is before passing judgement. He runs a good SC meeting and is a party loyalist. I would hope he has nothing to do with the Pascual thing. Someone I know talked with janitors and they said they knew nothing about having talks with them on the side.
I'm not sure the charter calls for an elections commission.
Right. People seem too often to rush to judgment or make assumptions without knowing any of the facts. And right... the charter does not call for an independent elections commission. That doesn't mean that it precludes one from being established. The charter does not call for a local LWV chapter, but alas. And in three years there is supposed to be a charter review. Good chance to fix a lot of the flaws in it.
if we live that long. In the meantime, our city is starting to resemble our State and Federal government. Little gets done and lots of bickering.
If Freudberg isn't mixed up in this then either he is too stupid to know he was used to create the public mess or hasn't shown the balls to speak up after he should have realized he was used.
someone will get to the bottom this
But Jim will they get to the bottom of it before the election where it matters or after the election where it won’t?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home