Beacon Hill is silent over State Police problems

This sums up what most aware citizens know... the Legislature doesn't want to take on the State Cops.

 By Matt Rocheleau Globe Staff,September 30, 2019, 8:13 a.m.

Governor Charlie Baker and Colonel Kerry Gilpin spoke at an April 2018 press conference to announce a series of reforms to policies and procedures at the Massachusetts State Police. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe staff file/Globe staff

The Massachusetts State Police force has weathered a widespread fraud probe, was found to have discriminated in its hiring, and has faced repeated allegations of systemic corruption and coverups over the past two years.

Yet even as new cases of misconduct emerge, including the indictment on Sept. 18 of a trooper who allegedly fired a rifle at an unarmed ATV rider on a Boston highway, the response on Beacon Hill has been roughly the same: crickets.

“I don’t get it,” said Kevin M. Burke, a former legislator, prosecutor, and state public safety chief who the State Police hired to investigate one such scandal. “I’m mystified and frankly have been for a few months now.”

While lawmakers have wielded their bully pulpits to publicly bash other officials and closely scrutinize other agencies mired in controversy, the state’s largest law enforcement agency has remained virtually unchallenged.

Get Metro Headlines in your inboxThe 10 top local news stories from metro Boston and around New England delivered daily.

“The problem is there’s just too often a hesitancy to look at the State Police,” said Senator James Eldridge, a member of the Senate Committee on Post Audit and Oversight, who wants to hold oversight hearings. “It’s time for us to take a deeper look.”

Eldridge and several State House observers attributed the inaction to fears that criticism could lead to political blowback, especially from a historically strong — though now scandal-ridden — troopers’ union. That, combined with a general reticence to take on law enforcement, appears to underpin the political establishment’s passive approach, they noted.

Several lawmakers, including House Speaker Robert DeLeo, have defended their response by pointing to a few measures that were tucked into the statewide budget in the summer of 2018 to try to bolster accountability in the department. They expressed hope that those efforts will pay off down the road. But those measures, such as the creation of an independent auditing unit, have been modest and slow to take root.

“Overall, the State Police have gotten a bye from the political establishment in the Commonwealth,” said Boston University professor Tobe Berkovitz, who specializes in political campaigns and communication. “It just befuddles me.”

Governor Charlie Baker responded to recent requests for comment about State Police as he usually does: with a version of a statement that notes he is pleased with a slate of reforms announced early last year by Colonel Kerry Gilpin, as well as the agency’s efforts since.

“The Department has made significant progress to increase transparency and accountability,” said the statement from Baker spokeswoman Sarah Finlaw. The statement highlighted the department’s installation of GPS technology in cruisers, the start of a body camera pilot program, and internal payroll audits.

Yet, several of the pledged reforms are unfinished and significantly overdue, and the rest of the changes have failed to slow the drumbeat of controversy at the agency.

The Globe reached out to more than a dozen lawmakers in recent weeks, including leaders of key committees focused on public safety issues and oversight. About half either declined to comment about State Police or did not respond to repeated requests, including Senate President Karen Spilka.

Those who did weigh in called the problems swirling around State Police deeply “troubling” and “disturbing.” But they said they had no plans to act.

Senator John Keenan, chair of the Senate Committee on Post Audit and Oversight, said he hasn’t sought information from State Police because of the ongoing criminal probes.

Another case of Police misconduct over detail pay.

I wonder how in the world did this happen. Twenty two officers from Medford and suspended or reprimanded. And why wouldn't they be subject to face criminal charges?  I suspect and have no concrete evidence, that the same thing is happening across the State in smaller versions. It's ALL about that detail rate the cops get. I hope Fox digs deeper into how that many cops could get away with fraud and theft.

 https://www.boston25news.com/news/over-2-dozen-medford-police-officers-disciplined-for-alleged-detail-scandal/990378252

Mayor hosts an infrstructure Town Hall meeting

 Last night Steph and I went to this meeting. There were around 30 people, (out of 41K voters and 70K in total population), including employees of the Town. As usual, the sound in the hall was terrible and on replay, the sound is slightly better but not much.

It's important to watch this show as it is the, imo, the primer for an override ask next year and for years to come. No one sells these projects like the CFO. 

All of our buildings are in poor shape, all our roofs warranties are about to expire and we have another school to replace. I don't see how we have that much in the levy to spend 40, 50, 60 million a year to fix or replace what needs fixing or replacing.

http://207.172.210.8:5002/CablecastPublicSite/show/1816?channel=1

The new Red Flag law is working here in Mass.

From MASSLive:

By Scott J. Croteau | scroteau@masslive.com

A probation officer for the Massachusetts Probation Service has been placed on administrative leave and his guns taken away by a judge after he allegedly made statements about assaulting and imagining killing some staff members at the East Brookfield District Court.

While records on file with Massachusetts do not show any criminal charges filed in the case, Spencer police did file what is known as a ‘red flag’ petition in court asking a judge to strip Probation Officer Shawn Edwards’ firearms licenses and have his guns removed from his home.

The ‘red flag’ petition, known officially as a petition for extreme risk protection order, was filed by Spencer police on Sept. 12 and the case was transferred over the Worcester District Court, the first order of this kind to be heard in the Worcester courthouse.

The Massachusetts law was signed by Gov. Charlie Baker last summer and allows a judge to immediately suspend a person’s firearms licenses and have any firearms removed from a home. The petitions are used in other states, but only a handful have been sought in Massachusetts, the Boston Globe reported last month. The law allows family members or a local police officer to file for a petition.

In Edwards’ case, a Northampton District Court judge was brought in to hear the case on Friday. The judge extended a previously allowed order that suspended Edwards’ firearms licenses and resulted in firearms being removed from his Spencer home by authorities.

Judge Maureen Walsh extended the order after a hearing on Friday. The order was extended until March 20, 2020, according to paperwork on file in court.

The petition said Edwards owned three shotguns and a handgun.